Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Chambers (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete as a copyright violation.DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:37, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Keith Chambers
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously deleted at Articles for deletion/Keith Chambers, but given how long its been since then it may not be substantially similar to qualify for speedy deletion. Doesn't appear to have significant coverage by independent sources. DannyS712 (talk) 10:23, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DannyS712 (talk) 10:23, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete no criteria of WP:MUSICBIO. The article is merely an ad. Hekerui (talk) 11:17, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Earwig shows it’s a 91% match for this page. Mccapra (talk) 11:43, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:54, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:54, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete under WP:G12 As said, it's a 91% match to . If it is reworded and gets more reliable sources, it no longer qualifies for G12. --Stay safe, ◊ PRAHLAD balaji  (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 12:10, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Tagged for G12. Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:47, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.