Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Curtin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 02:23, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Keith Curtin

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Person not notable? The article is basically written by User:Dangermouse122002 as other users only have assisted with layout, categorisation and similar things. I'm wondering if it might be a non-notable person who wrote an article about himself. There is only one source, a two-page article, which is referenced over and over again. User:Dangermouse122002 has only worked on this article and has also uploaded the three images used in it. Special:WhatLinksHere/Keith Curtin only contains articles related to this deletion discussion, lists of new articles and lists of all living people, but nothing in article space. Stefan2 (talk) 20:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 00:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC)



Delete Self-promotional plug for a publicist (and not a very good plug at that). Take out the last two paragraphs about his mother, the routine jobs he has been employed to do (as have countless millions of others), the "succes" of those he has worked for, and we are left with..... a book that hasn't been published (or even finished!). Absolutely non-notable. Emeraude (talk) 14:12, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Vanity article, no establishment of notability. Cloudz 679 14:22, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.