Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Kelly (judge)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:49, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Keith Kelly (judge)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Looking at "What links here" and the page creation history, seems to be a WP:COI violation as well. -- RM 03:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as my searches noticeably found nothing else better, nothing for at least basic solid notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:19, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia practice has consistently treated the office of state court trial judge as a position that does not convey prima facie notability. Nothing else has been provided here to suggest that the subject has received sufficient coverage to pass WP:GNG or another notability criterion. --Arxiloxos (talk) 20:37, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. SST flyer  15:39, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. SST flyer  15:39, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons set forth in both !votes above (no need for me to repeat). 23:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.