Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Rosenkranz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Non-admin closure. The Evil Spartan (talk) 23:56, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Keith Rosenkranz

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Seemingly non-notable. Little mentions of him on news. Previously prodded by myself Montchav (talk) 13:21, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - No notability as per se, with no reliable sourcing backing up any of the evidence. Rt . 18:04, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  00:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 03:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I found quite a few reliable sources; He's been interviewed by CNN (twice), been in a USA Today article, and written an article for the New York Times. Seems to indicate notability to me. Of course, the article isn't in great shape, so a rewrite could be useful. Master of Puppets   Call me MoP! ☺ )  03:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, and his book was praised by Dick Cheney, who wrote a foreword for it. See here. I'll go about adding more information to the article. Master of Puppets   Call me MoP! ☺  18:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep per Master of Puppets.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 07:37, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.