Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Rothfus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to United States House of Representatives elections in Pennsylvania, 2010. There is no consensus, yet, that candidates from major parties should be exempt from WP:POLITICIAN (and there would be problems of definition in countries where the distinction between major and minor parties is less clear-cut than in the US). JohnCD (talk) 21:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Keith Rothfus

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Doesn't meet notability criteria per WP:POLITICIAN Arbor8 (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Failed candidates are not normally notable. All the references on the article refer to his candidacy; it's conceivable that he's done something else notable, e.g. at the Department of Homeland Security, but this would require demonstration. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:51, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → B  music  ian  01:35, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Redirect- To United States House of Representatives elections in Pennsylvania, 2010, where he is already appropriately mentioned, although it needs updating. Dru of Id (talk) 02:10, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Σ  τ  c . 00:39, 10 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep major party candidates for a national position should be considered as notable--the advantages of this is that it would save a lot of arguments, and we coyuld systematically make them ourselves as a matter of cpourse and not have to be dependent on the pr agents profession.  DGG ( talk ) 02:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect- To United States House of Representatives elections in Pennsylvania, 2010, subject has no independent notability worthy of an article. Valenciano (talk) 19:52, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.