Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Stroup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:33, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Keith Stroup

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

nominated for deletion due to not meeting notability guidelines — Preceding unsigned comment added by Treefrog55501 (talk • contribs) 2010/09/07 07:02:49
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:56, 21 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. A ridiculous nomination. The Washington Post article referenced in the article says that Stroup is "America's most famous marijuana lobbyist" and there are hundreds of reliable sources found by basic searches that would have been listed at the top of this discussion if the nominator had followed the simple instructions for deletion nomination. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:11, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - the Washington Post article is a substantial profile on him in a major daily. Additonally sources abound writing about his founding of NORML.,  are just two examples. -- Whpq (talk) 16:13, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - No need to call nominations ridiculous. Sources provided are enough. Shadowjams (talk) 09:44, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Sources prove notability. Joe Chill (talk) 21:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.