Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith T. Monda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 22:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Keith T. Monda

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete: No assertion of notability or evidence of notability. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:33, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - certainly not notable yet. Plus some people may have seen this article was added to the artists stub template - one way of drawing attention to yourself, with this result. Johnbod 03:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Question: I entered this page but certainly am not interested in violating the spirit of Wiki, and love that this actually gets debated. What sort of verification is acceptable for notability (have seen old medium write ups but am having trouble finding electronic versions: perhaps a certain testament to the provincialism of certain quarters of the art world)... Perhaps more philosophically, at what level is an artist deemed sufficiently notable? EJMarey 13:19, 5 October 2007 (UTC)EJMarey
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – Johnbod 03:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Answer: see WP:N and WP:BIO especially the "Creative professional" section under WP:BIO for more info. --Sc straker 15:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Sad to see it go but...: Thanks for pointing out these sections: got me up to speed much quicker. I suppose I'll contribute in more populated waters for the time being... A follow up question (and thanks for the civility and patience with this neophyte), should further press, etc. be produced on this artist is it okay to re-submit later?
 * Delete Fails WP:N and WP:BIO. --Sc straker 15:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

As for Johnbod's artist stub point, I think that was a mistake on my part: didn't mean to over-submit and am not the artist or a shill. Just new to Wiki EJMarey 22:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * when there is sufficient further material, re-create the article in your user apace, and ask at WP:Deletion Review for restoration of your new version. DGG (talk) 10:03, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * But I would think his career needs to develop considerably for him to be notable - the odd notice in a local paper is not enough. Johnbod 14:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.