Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Van Der Woodsen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Gossip Girl. Spartaz Humbug! 19:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Keith Van Der Woodsen

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject does not warrant its own article. Arguments to the contrary are not presented. The article has no references. I propose merging with parent article Gossip Girl Wefa (talk) 21:03, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, I was going to suggest redirecting to the Gossip Girl article, but if he isn't even listed as a minor character there, he doesn't deserve an article. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 21:38, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:43, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge I would recommend merging into the Gossip Girl article. Byronwrites (talk) 04:10, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * After additional research, it seems the character may have a major role on a new television show Valley_Girls Byronwrites (talk) 04:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment That project was abandoned in May when the CW declined to pick up the project revolving around a young Lily Van der Woodsen, so even in that case we won't learn about the character's younger years at all except in leaked dead script form.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Very minor character on this series. The very definition of "unseen father" that nobody talks about on the series or cares about. If he gets sprung onto the show in a later season, no prejudice to recreation, but for now there's no need for an article which basically reads "Keith is Serena's reclusive billionaire father".  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.