Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keller Junior High School

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 16:53, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

Keller Junior High School
Non-notable. Bart133 20:00, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Schaumburg, Illinois Riffsyphon1024 20:23, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete If the sum totol of articles about schools keeps popping up as being similar information as "Keller Junior High School is just that, a Junior High School. It is located in Schaumburg Illinois.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keller_Junior_High_School" then it is no wonder so many people want to automatically delete a page because it is a school.Weaponofmassinstruction 00:52, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Gamaliel 05:46, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Being a stub isn't a reason for deletion, and neither is being a school. Philip 10:32, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. --JuntungWu 12:33, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not an article, no evidence of notability. Jr high schools are not inherently notable. Wile E. Heresiarch 13:08, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing to merge. Better a redlink than this complete waste of time. Average Earthman 19:02, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. What Wile said. Plus, before 18 school attendance is compulsory in many countries--articles for schools are like articles for automobile insurance in Idaho or driver's licenses in Western Australia ; sure it impacts thousands of people's lives, but not in a uniquely significant way. Most schools are cookie-cutter copies of thousands of others (there are 16,054 public middle/junior high schools in the US alone). Second choice is merge/redir to Schaumburg, Illinois, although that will probably be one of the smallest merges in Wikipedia history. Niteowlneils 19:06, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually, if redired, Community Consolidated School District 54 would be a better target, as it has more info on the school. Niteowlneils 21:25, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

It would be legit if someone from the area added more schools to a list within Schaumburg, wouldn't it? Riffsyphon1024 07:23, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Another inherently notable public institution.--Centauri 22:02, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. People have kids; they send them to school to be educated. Many aspects of this phenomenon are documented at length in the Wikipedia. School nostalgia and vanity to the contrary notwithstanding, the school that you went to is insignificant; the school I went to is insignificant; the school that practically everybody went to is insignifcant. --BM 22:28, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless it gathers references and substance - David Gerard 23:11, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another inherently non-notable public institution stub. Jayjg (talk) 03:22, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. &rarr;Raul654 06:20, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Schools are inherently non-notable. --Carnildo 07:26, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can I have an "auto-delete" vote for articles like this? :) &mdash; Stevie is the man!  Talk 08:56, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Schaumburg, Illinois and delete - Skysmith 09:53, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Xezbeth  10:31, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow for organic growth and expansion. GRider\talk 18:11, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Like someone already said, junior high schools are not inherently notable, except for specific examples. sugarfish 18:14, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as poorly written newbie experiment and not because it's about a school. This is nearly useless as it stands, even for alumni or anyone researching the subject, remote a possibility as that might be IMO.  For the record, I don't vote de facto either for or against school articles.  I do, however, vote against pure nothingness like this. - Lucky 6.9 19:25, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Carrp 19:27, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Why hasn't been speedided? --Neigel von Teighen 19:28, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability not established.  Just because someone is too lazy to write more than one uninformative sentence does not mean we should indulge that person by keeping their contribution of dubious worth.  Even if a good article is just waiting to be written on this very school, it will be written by an interested party whether this worthless sentence is here or not. Indrian 00:27, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Indrian, can I quote you and everyone else here who thinks well-written articles on schools should be kept and not VfD'd into redlinks? I have a few lined up as long-term projects, noably those related to Weaponofmassinstruction 06:38, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect what little there is here to offer. &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 10:11, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This article is about 2 schools. I've improved the article now and established the notability of the schools. --Andylkl 11:22, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A 2002 teacher award and a third-place competition finish? This is notability? --Calton 11:55, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. &mdash;Ben Brockert (42) 00:00, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * keep this. Yuckfoo 19:03, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep One shouldn't have a reason to keep, the page, but a reason for deletion must be present... Beta_M talk, |contrib ( &Euml;-Mail )
 * Delete. . &mdash;Korath (Talk) 04:14, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. TomTheHand 04:15, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Schoolcrufta delenda est! Edeans 04:24, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.