Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kellie Copeland Swisher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Redirect to Kenneth Copeland. Lankiveil (speak to me) 02:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Kellie Copeland Swisher

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

She is a pastor and daughter of televangelist Kenneth Copeland. The article notes she is part of a video series and music. However the importance of this isn't established. This was originally prod-ed, but it was removed without reason by an IP who also added the word "dynamic" to describe her videos. We66er (talk) 20:59, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:00, 22 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Redirect to daddy. There is no independent significance, and one cannot inherit an encyclopedia entry.  Utgard Loki (talk) 13:12, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Kenneth Copeland as she is currently non-notable. Pie is good   (Apple is the best)  19:35, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:32, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Notability is not inherited. We have a pastor's daughter who married a pastor, with whom she runs a NN church.  The lack of links to other WP articles other than her father's speaks for itself.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:43, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect--she deserves a paragraph under her pops, no more. Drmies (talk) 01:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete -- This article is completely uselss and poorly written. --24.11.211.126 (talk) 07:01, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.