Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Craighead


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 01:42, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Kelly Craighead

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The subject does not meet WP:BIO. Her greatest claim to notability was as senior adviser to First Lady Hillary Clinton. Has not been the subject of any profiles. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 05:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * DELETE! No brainer. Living person. Dosent meet the Bio requirements. Also a quick googling can confirm that this isnt a person who has chosen to step into the public eye, and thus isnt fair game.
 * Keep - She does seem to pass WP:BIO as being the subject of multiple secondary sources. Here are a few ... [ http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56710 ]. WP:BIO does not require that a topic be the specific subject of "profiles." --Oakshade (talk) 06:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Though she's mentioned in those articles, they don't contain enough biographical information for an article, IMO. ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 06:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * All of these (and more) go beyond the scope of "passing mention," the type of coverage that would not pass WP:BIO. --Oakshade (talk) 07:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Remove The secondary sources repeat themselves and she's not been profiled in the print media or books. It's littering really.--WeakWinterSon (talk) 22:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC) — WeakWinterSon (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 
 * delete fails bio, no established or via google establishable notability.Bali ultimate (talk) 06:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 20:13, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:41, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. I may be willing to change my vote should substantive sources emerge.  I have looked through the three sources above, and all three only have a passing mention of this person.  Being named in a newspaper article is not in itself enough to establish notability, and I can't see where this person has received any independent, significant coverage.  --Jayron32. talk . contribs  02:54, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Oakshade's comments. Boston (talk) 03:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.