Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly DiPucchio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Never close so early but this clearly is a bad faith nomination! - - Please don't nominate 25 MINUTES after creation and you should be following WP:BEFORE!, Obvious Keep is obvious (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010  Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Kelly DiPucchio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable WP:AUTHOR Cubbie15fan (talk) 16:21, 23 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Author's work has been on the NYT best seller list many times and has won or been nominated for many awards. I have already identified three sources about her.  I believe she is notable and has been listed as an author who needed an entry created for her on the Project: Women Writers list.  --LibraryGurl (talk) 16:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep IRA Teacher's Choice selection, ALA Notable book selection, 2-time NY Times Best Seller's list, Gwen Frostic Award. Books translated into both Spanish and French, which would not happen if she weren't considered notable. SusunW (talk) 18:33, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Also pretty telling that nominator nominated within 30 minutes of creation. Clearly article was still being developed and that nominator did not do any verification of notability whatsoever. SusunW (talk) 19:14, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * One entry I made this past week was nominated for deletion within 5 minutes after I created it as I was adding content. The editor removed it but clearly some editors are moving on these requests far too quickly.  Is there a time frame policy for nominating articles for deletion? --LibraryGurl (talk) 22:17, 23 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep I just started adding sources to the article: there are a ton more which I'll try to add today. She's been reviewed by major journals and newspapers. The nominator did not do even a preliminary WP:BEFORE, as Google News turns up many sources. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:47, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. At this point, the article has several reliable sources establishing notability, plus book awards and nominations are notable. Fuzchia (talk) 21:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.