Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Divine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:56, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Kelly Divine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable porn star. Only has nominations for minor awards and mainstream appearances were minor as well. She's not even listed on IMDb for the two episodes of the TV series she was supposedly appeared in. Fails GNG, Pornbio and other applicable notability guidelines. Also the article has BLP problems with supposed real name of performer and unsourced name of her young child. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 17:57, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:04, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:04, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:05, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 8 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Any claims of notability per WP:BASIC or WP:ENT cannot be supported by reliable secondary sources. This performer would not have even passed PORNBIO when it was in effect.  The article's non-trivial references are promotional material coming from the subject.  As usual, the award nominations don't cite significant coverage. An independent search for RS coverage came up with only false positives. • Gene93k (talk) 04:36, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete another is a very long list of articles on non-notable pornographic actresses.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete no sign of significant coverage in reliable sources except for trade publications and no major award wins or minor ones claimed Atlantic306 (talk) 16:39, 13 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.