Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Fraasch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Kelly Fraasch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable local politician lacking substantial coverage. Article resembles a resume. red dogsix (talk) 13:43, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete one of a number of local councillors for a town of 33,000 people hardly bodes well. Looking around, she gets some routine coverage in the local newspaper for an organisation she set up and that's it. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Valenciano (talk) 14:09, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Municipal councillors are not deemed to pass WP:NPOL except in major, internationally famous global cities — absent that, you have to be able to source them over WP:GNG for some other reason beyond the mere fact of being a municipal councillor. But this makes no other claim that would get her over another Wikipedia inclusion bar — and it relies on minimal sourcing, with #1 being her own profile on her own employer's website (an invalid primary source) and the rest simply namechecking her existence in conjunction with exclusively local coverage of a social issue (and thus failing to demonstrate that she's nationally or internationally recognized for that work.) In addition, there's a probable WP:COI here if you check the creator's username — while that isn't technically a deletion rationale in and of itself, it confirms that the intent here had more to do with public relations than with Wikipedia's inclusion standards for politicians. Bearcat (talk) 22:31, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. My media sweeps did not find sufficient evidence to meet the WP:GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:36, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW. If she were a city councillor of Pittsburgh, a large and storied city, perhaps there would be an argument to keep.  As it is, she's not yet notable.  Perhaps when she gets elected to Congress or the State assembly? Bearian (talk) 17:14, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.