Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Lorencz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Kelly Lorencz

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable party functionary, with nothing else for sourcing other than what's given in the article. The PPC is very much a 4th place party in Canada, being associated with it doesn't bring much to notability (as would any party functionary). Oaktree b (talk) 20:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 20:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsuccessful election candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates, and regional party functionaries do not get Wikipedia articles just for being regional functionaries, but the article is referenced entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability at all and features none of the reliable source coverage about him in real media that would be necessary to establish that he passed WP:GNG for anything. Bearcat (talk) 19:59, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Poorly sourced and as stated, unsuccessful candidates are not automatically eligible for articles given the routine coverage they would receive. SportingFlyer  T · C  16:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to People's Party of Canada. Moondragon21 (talk) 20:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agree with nominator; fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL with a complete lack of secondary sources. User:Let'srun 22:07, 18 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.