Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Moore (writer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) czar   &middot;   &middot;  19:21, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Kelly Moore (writer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This person fails WP:BASIC and WP:AUTHOR. The biggest failing is a lack of substantial coverage in independent sources. JFHJr (㊟) 15:04, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Failure of WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK when you apply WP:42. Qworty (talk) 22:56, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Her book was published by a top-tier house, was on NYT list for seven weeks and has a lot of mainstream media coverage. Passes Wikipedia WP:AUTHOR because it was made into a movie. Also passed WP:BK re: notability and library holdings.Spoonkymonkey (talk) 23:21, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  16:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: I've cleaned out a lot of the stuff in the article that was sourced by non-reliable sources, so this is to be taken into account now. I'm leaning towards keep because of the Deadly Medicine book and for the reviews of her other book. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Her book "Deadly Medicine" was made into a TV movie and is notable enough for its own entry, but even if it wasn't, the combined coverage for both of her books is enough for her to pass WP:AUTHOR. The thing about that policy is that even if the books aren't notable enough to merit individual entries, coverage for the works in RS can (and often does) show notability to merit an entry for the author of the works. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:44, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per most of the above. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 12:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - This deletion request appears to be a spillover from the deletion requests for Tucker Reed and The Amber House Trilogy. However, her notability is established by Deadly Medicine.  This is a spillover.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Nobability has been shown, including being a New York Times best-selling author. AuthorAuthor (talk) 17:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.