Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Park Compton Crips (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Clear consensus that all mentions are of the trivial or unreliable sort. NW ( Talk ) 19:56, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Kelly Park Compton Crips
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable set of a gang. Attempts to establish notability by mentioning notable rappers who are allegedly members (might be a BLP issue there), but doesn't assert notability for the set itself. Passing mentions and trivial coverage, but lack of significant coverage in reliable sources lead to failing WP:ORG. Was AfD's in 2008 and was withdrawn when someone found a minor mention on Google Scholar and trivial mentions in gnews. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:30, 5 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:57, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. All the Ghits I found seem to only be linked to YouTube or to each other. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 16:44, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 00:42, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 00:42, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Speedy Keep per overall notability.--Judo112 (talk) 16:39, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * What "overall notability"? The single TV report about what some of their members planned to do? Or the trivial mention from the GREAT website that doesn't even use the full name of the set? Niteshift36 (talk) 18:22, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I have said it many times and i say it again. what my opinion is is MY opinion.. and for a nominator trying to convince another perosn to change hes/hers opinion is a very long shot that often fails.--Judo112 (talk) 19:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * But it is rather pointless to provide your opinion without any explanation as to why you feel this way. Most closing admins will simply disregard your opinion and not take it into account in their closure. This is not a vote, opinions without arguments (preferably policy- and guideline based arguments) have no impact. Fram (talk) 14:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I ASKED what you found to be "overall notability". I didn't try to convince you of anything.Niteshift36 (talk) 14:11, 14 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The singel source provides notability to its minimum. which is enough to provide notabiltiy.atleast in my book.--Judo112 (talk) 13:58, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Burdon of prof is upon the editor(s)/creater of this article to establish notability.  As of 18SEP09, notability has not been shown. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:25, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.