Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Sadler (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 22:31, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Kelly Sadler
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NJOURNALIST and WP:GNG. While there are 23 sources, none cover the subject in depth. Most offer only a brief mention of Sadler in relation to broader Trump administration controversies. Blurbs about her comments regarding John McCain do not contribute to GNG per WP:BLP1E. KidAd •  SPEAK  20:24, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Journalism. Shellwood (talk) 21:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Conservatism,  and Politics.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:05, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - appears to fail WP:GNG/WP:BASIC, including due to a lack of WP:SUSTAINED, in-depth coverage, and per WP:BLP1E: 1. reliable sources only seem to cover Sadler in the context of the single event of her losing her job, e.g. CNN, June 6, 2018, NYT June 5, 2018, NBC News, June 6, 2018, CBS News, June 5, 2018, USAToday, June 6, 2018; 2. She appears to otherwise remain and likely to remain a low-profile individual, based on attempts to find sources about her since this event; and 3. the event does not appear to have been significant due to the limited burst of coverage about it, and Sadler's role does not appear to be substantial or well-documented, based on the limited and repetitive reporting on the event. Beccaynr (talk) 16:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC) There also appears to be insufficient support for WP:JOURNALIST notability. Beccaynr (talk) 01:41, 8 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete as per the nomination and the policy based logic given above. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 14:20, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete after looking at the article and the sources and reading the Beccaynr talk, I agree to delete it. Amir cheraghian (talk) 09:13, 11 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.