Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Wanser


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 06:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Kelly Wanser

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The only serious source talking about this person is this. I looked for others on google and only found podcasts and promotional interviews, some with self-admitted friends of her. Bolt and Thunder (talk) 03:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Businesspeople, Women,  and United States of America. Bolt and Thunder (talk) 03:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - with all respect to the nominator, there are a number of serious books that dedicate coverage to Wanser, both positive and negative. All one has to do is to click the "Books" link in the Find Sources section on this very page. I agree that much of that information needs to be added to the subject's article, but a lack of effort on editors' part (so far) to improve this article is not a very good reason for deletion. Fred Zepelin (talk) 21:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * In 2022, IEEE Spectrum, an engineering magazine that's been around 60 years, conducted an in-depth interview with her, which wasn't used as a source. I added it. Fred Zepelin (talk) 21:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep: Has good RS online. Subject is notable enough. Adhi2004 (talk) 10:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep As is mentioned there is coverage in a number of books- this coverage also spans a number of years, which also suggests they are notable enough. Editing84 (talk) 09:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.