Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelricson Garlin Valdoria Skolia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. I can't find a suitable target for merging, so closing this as keep to allow for continued discussion on the article's talk page. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:10, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Kelricson Garlin Valdoria Skolia

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

unsourced. non-notable fictional character bio that is inappropriate for inclusion. delete. Jack Merridew 08:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- Jack Merridew 08:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  -- Jack Merridew 08:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to an appropriate character list. Edward321 (talk) 13:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge per previous editor. Debresser (talk) 18:41, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * merge Any significant character in a notable work  should get a one or two paragraph description.  We're here to provide encyclopedic information--and if the main work is worth covering in the first place, people are likely to want some degree of detail. Why else would you use an encyclopedia  in the first place, if you didn't want detailed coverage? And,   there is certainly no   valid reason why there should not at least be a redirect.    Anything anyone might want to look up should have a redirect if there's relevant content in Wikipedia.  DGG (talk) 00:49, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The notion of redirects without bound runs afoul of WP:NOT. Abductive (talk) 22:39, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * speedy keep
 * Delete, 27 Google hits, no third party analyses, not the character's name. Abductive (talk) 20:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Main character in several of the books, in this notable series.  D r e a m Focus  21:01, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.