Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelsick and Wilkin Monopoly Breakers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Procedural Keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Kelsick and Wilkin Monopoly Breakers

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Completely minor and irrelevant parties that never won a seat, got more than 100 votes, or participated in more than 1 election. Yilku1 (talk) 00:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages:
 * --Yilku1 (talk) 00:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * --Yilku1 (talk) 00:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * --Yilku1 (talk) 00:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * --Yilku1 (talk) 00:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * --Yilku1 (talk) 00:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  01:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Yilku1 (talk) 00:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Caribbean.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  06:10, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment The AfD is flawed, as there are several errors in the deletion rationale:
 * The claim made that the parties listed did not take part in more than one elections is wrong as two of the parties listed did contest more than one election (Kelsick and Wilkin Monopoly Breakers and United People's Party).
 * The claim made that the parties listed never received more than 100 votes is wrong – all but two of them received over 100 votes in an election: The People's Political Movement received 1,346 votes (11% of the national total), the Saint Kitts Democratic Party 905 votes (9% of the national total), the United People's Party 605 votes and the United National Empowerment Party 263 votes.
 * The claim made that the parties listed as "minor and irrelevant" is wrong as the People's Political Movement was the second-most voted for party in the 1961 elections, while the Saint Kitts Democratic Party was the second-most voted for party in the 1957 elections.
 * I'm not opposed to the Kelsick and Wilkin Monopoly Breakers, Progressive Liberal Party, United National Empowerment Party or United People's Party articles being deleted as they were very minor, but the People's Political Movement and Saint Kitts Democratic Party were clearly significant parties at the time of the elections in question. Number   5  7  08:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Procedural Keep per Number 57. These deserve individual source searches. SportingFlyer  T · C  16:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.