Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelvin Wu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No strong consensus to keep or delete following two relistings. Article may be renominated after a suitable period. Philg88 ♦talk 09:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Kelvin Wu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The refrences are currently as follows: (1) a report at Bloomberg businessweek which contains one brief mention of Kelvin Wu, stating only that he was hoping to be able to take over local competitors, (2) an announcement by the Securities and Futures Commission that they bannted Kelvin Wu King Shiu from re-entering the industry for two and a half years, and (3) a news report saying that he was thinking of expanding his business interests into new areas. None of this is the sort of substantial coverage that is needed. A search for sources produced press releases, thsi Wikipedia article, Twitter, business-promotion sites, more brief news reports about his business plans, etc, but nothing better. Note: A PROD was removed without any reason at all being given. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:20, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 14:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 14:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 14:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: My reason for removing the PROD was that a previous editor had already withdrawn a nomination for speedy deletion on the basis of sources being found. --Sammy1339 (talk) 15:06, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: My reason to support retaining this page is: although there is limit articles about Wu in English, there are plenty of articles in Chinese that support Wu is a notable person in Hong Kong and his importance on retain the business of HMV in Hong Kong area. Manhei.chiu (talk) 09:18, 29 October 2014 (UTC) signature added back  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manhei.chiu (talk • contribs) 08:28, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If that is true, then it is certainly a perfectly good reason for keeping the article. Can you point us to some of those articles? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Here are some articles in chinese, which they mainly stated that Wu is the white knight to save HMV Hong Kong from bankruptcy. And how is he going to manage HMV in the future.Manhei.chiu (talk) 04:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Sky post: http://www.skypost.hk/%E6%B8%AF%E8%81%9E/%E6%96%B0%E8%81%9E%E4%BA%8C%E6%A2%9D/20130301/001/%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AFHMV%E7%8D%B2%E7%99%BD%E6%AD%A6%E5%A3%AB%E6%89%93%E6%95%91/81861 Mingpao:  http://tssl.mingpao.com/htm/marketing/hkbrand/cfm/mag3.cfm?File=20130415/mag/eca1_er.txt mpfinance: http://www.mpfinance.com/htm/finance/20130124/news/ec_ggb1.htm eastweek: http://eastweek.my-magazine.me/index.php?aid=26209


 * delete This article was created by WP:SPA user Kelvin Wu Kin Shiu kwks (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. seems a self promotion and not enough for WP:N and WP:GNG - Krutim 11:30, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:41, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:33, 13 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.