Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kemar Jarrett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. Fram (talk) 10:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Kemar Jarrett

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Without references, this is about as blatant a WP:BLP violation as it's possible to get. Even if it is referenced, I'd question whether there is anything notable about this particular case. –  iride scent  22:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Comment FWIW, it is referenced adequately, to articles in the leading national newspaper. They were not formatted properly, so they didnt display in a references section (I fixed that). Since the last information in the article is 2004, there's probably more. DGG (talk) 23:25, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Strike the BLP issue in that case – but I'd still question whether he warrants an article. Sadly, the world has a lot of murderers. However, I don't know how major a case this was in Jamaica and am certainly prepared to be persuaded otherwise. – iride  scent   23:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:19, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Seems to be a notable criminal, top of a most wanted list is a pretty exclusive club. Gigs (talk) 01:32, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, I'm inclined to agree with Gigs here. Enough sources have been included to solve the egregious WP:BLP problems originally noted; and being number one on a country's most-wanted list is one of the better indicators of notability I can think of. ~ mazca  t 10:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree, #1 on the most wanted list is pretty big. The sources issue can be fixed by, say, adding sources?--Unionhawk Talk 13:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.