Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kemi Otegbade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 06:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Kemi Otegbade

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. red dogsix (talk) 16:41, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. FloridaArmy (talk) 18:36, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:08, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:08, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:08, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: She is not the primary focus of the few rs that mentions her name, the likes of Nigeria Best Forum can't validate anything. Tone of article also promote subject in an unverifiable subjective manner. Non notable. HandsomeBoy (talk) 08:00, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: After further search, I discovered she was the executive producer of a notable reality show, and her management of the show led to some controversies. Aside the Vanguard interview, which doesn't seem independent, nothing else seem substantial enough to make this PR woman notable, at least not for now. Article is also filled with puffery. Still sticking with delete. HandsomeBoy (talk) 19:43, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep: Seems like she has had some notable activities under "Other Activities" section. There are also several proper references from valid sources.Peter303x (talk)
 * Comment - How does any of that support inclusion via WP:BIO or WP:N? red dogsix (talk) 17:31, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.