Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Bone (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) --Nev&eacute;–selbert 16:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Ken Bone (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:3DABS, this is an utterly pointless disambiguation page. The hatnote here (now removed) at Ken Bone satisfied the ambiguity just fine. --Nev&eacute;–selbert 13:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Perfectly reasonable disambiguation page, all 3 subjects are notable except one has his article merged with the 2016 presidential election due to him becoming notable because of this, and the other has a slightly different name. Passes WP:3DABS AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 13:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The necessity for such a disambiguation page is thin, given that Ken Bone's hatnote was more than capable of handling three topics without clutter.--Nev&eacute;–selbert 14:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, WP:3DABS actually recommend the opposite of what is proposed here. older ≠ wiser 14:13, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Er, the hatnote was only 25 words or 164 characters.--Nev&eacute;–selbert 14:17, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * That's well over two and a half lines on my display. The hatnote probably should be even shorter; a simple other persons would be sufficient. older ≠ wiser 14:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as noted above, this is a perfectly reasonable dab page. Lepricavark (talk) 18:54, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 21:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Ehh. "Ken Bone" can only refer to two people on Wikipedia, but the dab page is harmless nonetheless. For the record, I've never seen WP:3DABS used to justify deletion of a dab page before. I guess there's a first for everything... -- Tavix  ( talk ) 22:03, 26 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep per all comments above. Otherwise the hatnote gets too lengthy. Boleyn (talk) 09:45, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.