Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Fox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Ken Fox

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

selfwritten vanity nn, no indication of notability beyond other businessmen Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 06:53, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Covered in CNN Money, Business week as listed in the article. At the very least, this would be a merge to Internet Capital Group. -- Whpq (talk) 16:31, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep this is not my area of expertise but there seem to be plenty of sources explicitly referring to this guy. Nergaal (talk) 00:39, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Better sourced than most, and many of the significant sources (Fortune, Business Week) are actually ABOUT him rather than the usual trivial mention. I never heard of the guy but that's not a criterion here. --MelanieN (talk) 02:50, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.