Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Melvoin-Berg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 17:41, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Ken Melvoin-Berg

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Trivial coverage of subject fails WP:N requirements for BIO. Subject is mentioned in passing in a handful of "Halloween" news items. Article created by an SPA reads like a resume and features many SPAM links. LuckyLouie (talk) 16:03, 19 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 18:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete no extensive coverage . LibStar (talk) 06:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete only one of his books is in worldcat, and that one (Wierdf Chi9cago) is in only 22 libraries. Not notable.   DGG ( talk ) 02:22, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK.  Also fails as a psychic--if he really had psychic powers, he would've foreseen that an AfD would go down in WP:SNOW for an article that he wrote about himself. Qworty (talk) 10:11, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.