Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken buck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. G4 Tone 16:51, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Ken buck

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

original was promo piece, this is an attack page, original was deleted and salted per Articles for deletion/Ken Buck Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 11:15, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G4 as the recreation of the Ken Buck article. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  12:00, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Just a question. Are District Attorney's of counties' not automatically notable?   ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪    ―Œ  ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣  12:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * From looking at WP:POLITICIAN it does not look like they are automatically notable.  GB fan  talk 13:00, 1 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. (Possibly G4 speedy delete). Ken Buck fails WP:POLITICIAN. Coverage from running for office does not establish notability. Poll numbers don't establish notability either. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nothing in the article establishes notability. I can't find significant coverage of him to establish notability
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.