Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenan Arayıcı


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  03:35, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Kenan Arayıcı

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

BLP, fails GNG and BIO. Source in article is stats, BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).  // Timothy :: talk  02:06, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Turkey.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:54, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 01:41, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Although Arayıcı played in more than 100 Süper Lig matches, I can't find any German- or Turkish-language coverage that is better than a match report or contract announcement. He has been interviewed in the German media since becoming a manager, but I can't find any independent sources that provide significant coverage. Article comprehensively fails WP:GNG. Jogurney (talk) 17:49, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. A good part of the Turkish sports coverage from the era is offline, but I would expect at least pointers that suggest there is SIGCOV out there about him, and there are none. Only coverage I was able to find were and, which leave a lot to be desired. --GGT (talk) 21:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.