Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendall Almerico


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong | [confabulate] || 05:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Kendall Almerico

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There's some coverage that quotes him as an expert, but independent coverage in reliable sources appears to be limited to a stray sentence here or here. I don't think this meets WP:GNG. The article is also written like an advertisement. signed,Rosguill talk 21:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 21:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 21:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 September 25.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 21:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment This is a duplicate nomination. Mccapra (talk) 21:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Weird, this one page appears to have been transcluded twice to the AfD log. I removed one of them manually, so hopefully the issue has been resolved. signed,Rosguill talk 21:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The ad language should definitely be toned down but appears to meet GNG. Sigcov here and here after just a quick pass through existing refs. Looks like he’s been involved in some pretty high profile issues - Goldenseed in particular - and cov isnt limited to his role at a single corporation as we so often see with CEO pages/promo garbage. FWIW there appears to be additional coverage from a quick search that hasn’t been included in this article and helps tip the notability scale WP:ARTN. 70.238.168.205 (talk) 14:04, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The first of those linked sources, both of which I had already read as they are cited in the article, does not look like a reliable source. The second has pretty fleeting coverage of Almerico, and only really discusses StarTrust. signed,Rosguill talk 16:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 18:15, 4 October 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. I am not finding much more than one-sentence mentions. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:56, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:18, 12 October 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The SandDoctor  Talk 05:41, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Promo for a somewhat well-known attorney who nonetheless fails WP:BASIC. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Given the sources, and the somewhat controversial nature of his clients, meets GNG.  73.52.118.35 (talk) 15:33, 23 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.