Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendall Dabaghi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 22:07, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Kendall Dabaghi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Most of the citations seem to be articles about Ashton Kutcher; it is likely more appropriate to redirect to that page. Fulbright recipients don't seem to be notable in and of themselves: "Fulbright Scholar" redirects to "Fulbright program." Fulbright program contains a list of already notable recipients, which would make it tautological to say receipt satisfies WP:NOTABLE on its own. None of the criteria of WP:Notability_(academics) are met, either.

The regional Forbes article is insufficient to satisfy WP:NOTABLE, as it is a list rather than a journalistic article. I.e. this could be proper citation, but is not in and of itself qualifying as notable. No other member of this list has an article solely based on their inclusion on the list, and only a handful have articles at all--if they do, the articles are for other reasons without mentioning this particular list. I don't see any other suggestions of notability to address.

The lack of citations in the infobox and personal data give me pause about the authorship of the article re: WP:BLPEDIT. If we deleted the unsourced personal info/material, the article might be a stub, or less. If inclusion in Wikipedia is warranted at all, a redirect to the "Other Work" section of the Ashton Kutcher article seems proper. DonGeiss (talk) 03:18, 18 July 2018 (UTC) (talk) 20:38, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Additionally, the only two users to make edits to the article Davisj5525 and HJones2579 have only made edits related to this article. The format of the names is oddly similar. It seems likely that these accounts are a) affiliated, and b) were created only to make this article. DonGeiss (talk) 03:22, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:43, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes  20:38, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Authorial suspicions aside, cited references are not independent, reliable sources offering significant coverage of the subject, and the magazine lists and scholarships are selective but not significant honors in the Wikipedia sense. Search finds more coverage of a company that seems to have attracted coverage only because Ashton Kutcher was involved, and an unfortunate story about a family member in which subject is mentioned in passing. Bakazaka (talk) 22:00, 25 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Doesn't meet criteria for WP:NOTABLE. Notability is not inherited through association with a notable person. CoronaryKea (talk) 11:46, 26 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.