Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendall Yount (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 05:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Kendall Yount
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Local coverage and routine sports reporting is not enough to meet the GNG. She lost her only fight at the 2014 world youth championships in the round of 32. She lacks success as an adult with a current world ranking of 244 and seems unlikely to make the Olympics with an Olympic ranking of 379. Success as a junior competitor is not enough to show notability.Sandals1 (talk) 17:48, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:10, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:10, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:10, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. PRehse (talk) 20:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete As per nominator.PRehse (talk) 20:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete There's no doubt she had success as a junior, but that isn't generally considered sufficient to show notability for athletes. Her only world ranking points come from making the quarterfinals of the 2017 Universiade tournament (which means her competition would have been adult, but limited). Her failure to have success as an adult argues against notability and I don't see enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. I also don't believe that WP:MANOTE is met. I voted to keep this article at the first discussion, but in retrospect I must have been using my far too cloudy crystal ball. Papaursa (talk) 16:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.