Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendine's Formula


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob e  rt  01:02, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Kendine's Formula
Appears to be a hoax/neologism. No Google hits outside of WP. Any references to it in other articles were inserted by the original author. howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 20:15, 2 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete: Unverified, no real significance. Probably vanity, probably posted by a Kendine or Ken Dine (both "names" used in the article). Hu 04:35, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Even the "quote" from Poor Richard's Almanac is fake. --  Dalbury ( Talk )  14:43, 3 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.