Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenilworth, Erie County, New York


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:23, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Kenilworth, Erie County, New York

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Some concern on Talk:Kenilworth,_Erie_County,_New_York that this may not exist despite the USGS thinking that it does.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  16:40, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  Ϣere  Spiel  Chequers  16:40, 4 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Support Deletion 'Kenilworth' is not a designated census place and searches of other GIS for this name come up negative. The article does not meet standards for verifiability or notability.  Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. I support deletion of this article as it is not supported by any solid references.  Dhpage (talk) 17:29, 4 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Note Kenilworth is mentioned numerous times in historical sources e.g. "When police were appraised Monday of the disappearance of Ransom Woodward, thirteen years old, 60 Midland Avenue, Kenilworth, town of Tonawanda..." (Buffalo Courier 21 April 1926). It may no longer be regarded as a separate entity but if it was once notable we should have an article on it.Pontificalibus 17:40, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep A verified place. History of the Town of Tonawanda, Erie County, New York, 1805-1930" states "On the east side of old Delaware Road and extending past Colvin Boulevard to the Niagara Falls Boulevard two hamlets are growing up within the boundaries of the town of Tonawanda — Ellwood and Kenilworth. These thriving and beautiful hamlets are the outgrowth of early settlements in that section of the town...". There should be plenty of sources, possibly not online, but if not we should merge rather than delete.Pontificalibus 17:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:36, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:22, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Appears to be a recognised settlement. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:27, 18 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.