Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kennebec Regional Development Authority


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Kennebec Regional Development Authority

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotionalism for small business development  organization ; no real justification for notability and only very local references  DGG ( talk ) 05:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 05:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 05:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as my searches are finding a few several links so far but still nothing actually solidly convincing this isn't anything else than a local group. SwisterTwister   talk  07:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe deckertalk 22:10, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete If the first reference were an article on Wikipedia I would call it a coat rack. It starts out talking about the park, then most of the very short article trumpets the virtues of the T-Mobile located there. The second ref shows that it exists. The third ref connects to its website. It seems some people are putting any old thing on Wikipedia. This organization is not noteworthy - the coverage is local because this is of regional concern. Also, sources other than those connected with the organization are needed. There has to be more coverage than it simply exists to be considered notable. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 04:30, 23 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete This organization has received only very local coverage, and there isn't even much of that. Clearly fails GNG.  Omni Flames ( talk ) 10:08, 30 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.