Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kennedale Wildcat Band


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Kennedale Independent School District.  MBisanz  talk 03:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Kennedale_Wildcat_Band
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The school appears unnotable and has not won any major national competitions, the article seems to have been created by a person of the school itself, possibly a band member. --Brandon (TehBrandon) (talk) 02:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. JJL (talk) 02:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Smerge to Kennedale Independent School District. Its just a highschool band and highschool extracurriculars, save for a few select exceptions, are non-notable. Insufficient reliable sourcing, or any sourcing for that matter; only 61 Ghits total . Icewedge (talk) 03:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge, but do get rid of it quickly. Bongo  matic  08:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —Cunard (talk) 06:00, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.   —Cunard (talk) 06:00, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:10, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge most of this to Kennedale High School rather than the school district article but merge the few non-high school related parts to Kennedale Independent School District. - Dravecky (talk) 16:12, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Addendum: I've performed quite a bit of cleanup and wikification on this article. If it could be sourced from third-party publications, I would happily reevaluate my initial "merge" reaction to "keep" but without such references then independent notability is not established. - Dravecky (talk) 19:41, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * keep might be bad precedent, but I'm going with keep on this one. I'd like to see the article expanded with more sources but I'm okay with it.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge seems reasonable. Perhaps it can be a sub-article? ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:52, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.