Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kennedy Leigh (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not a snowball's chance of another outcome. czar 08:01, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Kennedy Leigh
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable porn actress. G4 speedy declined because new article is too different from the previous deleted version. Still fails WP:PORNBIO with only a scene-related award win. Fails WP:GNG with no reliable sources cited and only a quote to CNBC found in searches. She appeared in a Pitbull music video but that falls well short of PORNBIO criterion #3. The only new facts since the 2014 deletion debate are a few more award nominations. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails both PORNBIO and GNG. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 00:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- non notable subject. "only a scene-related award win"? -- yes please. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:00, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet the required notability requirements. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 07:35, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom's sound analysis. Adding incoherent machine-translated junk text to a deleted article should not be sufficient to defeat db-repost. "Leigh has played in movies in multiple species apart from the normal relationship scene" is not a genuine claim of significance. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 11:06, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 12:02, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. The incomprehensible text and text with clear grammatical errors (which I have now removed) are strong indications of a basic competence issue.  Kablammo (talk) 13:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete a clearly non-notable pornographic actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:39, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt per all of the above.  Montanabw (talk)  18:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable for stand alone article; as noted, "only a scene-related award winner"; a real stretch on notability here. Kierzek (talk) 02:58, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails guidelines, salt is not necessary as there was a reasonable misunderstanding by the creator of the article about the guidelines. GuzzyG (talk) 23:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.