Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kennet Island


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Kennet Island

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Delete per WP:PROMO. Some parts of the articles are written like an advertisement (e.g. 'Located around the Central Piazza are a range of local businesses, including; Fidget & Bob, a café with excellent food & drink, and great reviews...'), and reference pages of property agencies. Ian1231100 (talk) 05:08, 3 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:52, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and England.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:27, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * It's not so promotional the article would need to be completely deleted, but there is a question of whether it's notable as a suburb versus a development that I can't answer just by looking at the sources in the article. (I just deleted the most blatant promo.) SportingFlyer  T · C  23:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete is the correct option here given the promotional nature of the article. CharlesWain (talk) 05:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.