Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Alan Turing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nothing relevant remains after WP:AFD rules applied. Speedy deleting as empty. -- The Anome (talk) 15:17, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Kenneth Alan Turing

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Seems to be well-sourced (and is), but Kenneth Alan Turing does not come up in any searches, and while he MAY have been a scientist involved in high-level areas of work, but this is unknown, and probably just a vanity article. The searches DO turn up an "Alan Turing", but they do not seem to be one and the same. Jmlk 1  7  06:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't find anything in Google and Ask. None of the references or links on the page mention his name. --ZacBowlingtalk 06:47, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - mmmm. tastes hoaxalicious--Jayron32| talk | contribs  06:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't out-and-out say that this is fake, but it certainly has the feel of a hoax about it. Lankiveil (talk) 06:45, 25 November 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete WP:HOAX. --Brewcrewer (talk) 07:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:V as well as the smell test. Sounds like a background for a comics villain. Probably some kind of WP:COATRACK for Echelon. ("They do not seem to be one and the same." D'ya think?) --Dhartung | Talk 08:12, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. References included demonstrate no notability for the article's subject.--Michig (talk) 09:17, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: unverifiable, none of the cites given support this person's existence, zero Google hits for name, looks like a probable WP:HOAX. -- The Anome (talk) 10:04, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: I just deleted all of the questionable, unreferenced claims as per WP:BLP, and nothing is left in the article. Sancho 11:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Previous version looked like a hoax. Current version fails to establish notability. Hammer1980 ·talk 11:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Junk. Nick mallory (talk) 12:18, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Speedy deleting, as article is no longer about subject, after WP:BLP procedures have been applied. -- The Anome (talk) 15:17, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.