Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth C. Bucchi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep, both due to consensus below and because the debate has sat for a month or so without resolution. (!) UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 03:31, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Kenneth C. Bucchi

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Vanity article being used to promote author's book (and his promotional article about it...). Subject fails WP:NOTE and all references to him seem to be FROM him. Bullzeye (Ring for Service) 06:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - I'm putting this up for CSD as non-notable person. αѕєηιηє t/c 06:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete; no substantial third-party coverage of him or his works that I could turn up. --MCB (talk) 07:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - User:Phil Bridger has updated the article with a claim of notability that leads to any number of news stories (see and ).  I'm a little hesitant to go with a full keep because of WP:BLP1E, but considering he's been on TV multiple times talking about this, I think it's worth a second look. -- jonny - m  t  09:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - multiple reliable sources (I add the 2nd, see also CNN), verifiable, and appears to have some effect. Bearian (talk) 16:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Subject has notability from reliable sources. I've tidied it up so it no longer appears as a vanity article looks neater and is in the tone expected. WilliamH (talk) 13:08, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.