Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Estenson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Kenneth Estenson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotion for non notable business man. Comments from him are not coverage about him. Article is bombarded with a lot of sources but falls short of GNG. PR, primary, interviews, routine announcements of comings and goings, listings. Claims he won a Primetime Emmy® Award but the Emmys don't mention him. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States-related deletion discussions.-- Nahal (T) 12:59, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:38, 10 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep The subject has multiple secondary source featured coverage in reliable sources. Subject was employed in upper management positions at major media companies. See featured articles, Nashville Business Journal, Hollywood reporter, Adweek, Featured here, |Featured here, also more than passing mention in Forbes. From what I have read, the 2007 Emmy award went to ABC – and the award is for Excellence in Interactive Television Programming: the subject was a VP of digital media, and as such the subject was a leader who shares in the Emmy. The subject passes our notability guide. Lightburst (talk) 17:27, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per Lightburst. Disney and CNN are some of the top corporations and reliable sources accompany his tenure. AmericanAir88(talk) 18:55, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete The linked feature-pieces are paid-for-spam. &#x222F; WBG converse 07:16, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:03, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:03, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:37, 17 July 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:10, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as undisclosed advertising, something I have blocked the creator for. MER-C 09:28, 26 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.