Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth G. Bostock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)  16:13, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Kenneth G. Bostock

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a writer and artist, which makes no claim to passing our notability standards for writers or artists, and cites no reliable source coverage about him in media to support anything. After stating that he exists, it just bulletpoints two résumé sections listing his work, while not providing actual notability claims for any of it, and the referencing consists of three primary sources and a blog entry. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can show stronger evidence of notability and better sourcing for it, but nothing in this version as written is enough. Bearcat (talk) 20:50, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above. Notability not established, and a quick Google search leads nowhere. Unable to establish notability. MX ( ✉  •  ✎  ) 23:01, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:03, 24 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: I found few reliable sources that convey any notability.   Dr Strauss   talk   08:39, 1 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.