Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth John Nies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  05:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Kenneth John Nies

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Claim to fame is that he is a former Abercrombie & Fitch model and in related to Eric Nies and John Nies. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Plastikspork (talk) 23:19, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: Note that Notability_(people) addresses people related to notable people, which does open the door for inclusion in the more notable persons article, which could be debated as well. Plastikspork (talk) 23:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - as the creator of this article I figured he was (maybe) notable enough because of his acting work but I'm happy to bow to consensus. "KJ Niles" gets more hits than ""Kenneth John Nies" but many of hits on the former are of different individuals than the one discussed here. BTW, John Nies and Eric Nies are mentioned in the article because familial relationships are a point of interest, not a point of notability. --Boston (talk) 23:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The sources the article has don't appear to me to be very reliable or demonstrate significant coverage, and I couldn't find anything else through a search to support Wiki-level notability or meeting of WP:ENTERTAINER criteria. No IMDb or Fashion Model Directory pages.    Mbinebri   talk &larr; 01:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no indication of notability even in his field. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:24, 5 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.