Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Kenafick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:34, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Kenneth Kenafick

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)


 * Fails WP:AUTHOR. Could not find no significant coverage under his name or the 2 alternate names he used. Also searched Australian search engine Trove. LibStar (talk) 00:51, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Poetry,  and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 01:10, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable enough for Wikipedia. Nocturnal781 (talk) 01:12, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think he passes WP:AUTHOR you can see lots of citations of his translation of Marxism, Freedom and the State (C1) and more clearly passes C3 due to the multiple independent reviews of the translation. This wasn't in the article at the point of nomination, I found them. It wasn't too easy due not just his multiple names, but they they tend to be written "K. J. Kenafick" and "Kenafick, K. J." being the terms that got the most hits, but "Marxism, Freedom and the State" in ProQuest and Wikipedia Library really being the best way to verify what I'm saying. CT55555 (talk) 03:22, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I have notified WikiProject Socialism about this discussion via the project talk page. CT55555 (talk) 03:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree with the above. There is quite enough to keep this article. --Bduke (talk) 05:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment. I think there is a typo in the nomination "Could not find no significant coverage" has a double negative that implies significant coverage was found, but I assume @LibStar meant to say the opposite. CT55555 (talk) 05:50, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * correct. Thanks for picking it up. LibStar (talk) 05:56, 9 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep - This person has their own collection in a national library. That definitely meets WP:GNG.KatoKungLee (talk) 16:42, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per CT55555, Bduke, KatoKungLee. I've also added 2 RSs. Cabrils (talk) 00:21, 11 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.