Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth L. Ton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. X clamation point  03:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Kenneth L. Ton

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The subject was a high school drama teacher, like thousands of others across the country. There is nothing noteworthy enough in his background, career, or achievements to warrant his having an entry in Wikipedia. Allowing this article to remain could be perceived as an invitation to create articles about every beloved teacher everyone ever had. LiteraryMaven (talk) 23:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Nothing about this biography seems to meet notability criteria, and the footnotes seem to be an attempt by an experienced wikipedian to make the article look legitimate on the surface.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Subject is not distinguished and the references aren't reliable. 67.79.157.50 (talk) 14:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 05:29, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete per WP:BIO. The article has no real references, or notability. I agree with Literary Maven, with respect to high school teachers, most don't have enough notability to meet WP:GNG. FingersOn  Roids  20:10, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's no evidence that the subject meets the notability requirements of WP:BIO. Nuttah (talk) 09:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Passes neither WP:PROF nor WP:BIO. In addition to the points already made above, there is no trace of scholarly impact, and independent news coverage of the subject is nonexistent.--Eric Yurken (talk) 18:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.