Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Mejia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:19, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Kenneth Mejia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Kurykh (talk) 04:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 12:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 12:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Unelected candidate for political office who fails WP:NPOL and has no other claim to notability. AusLondonder (talk) 17:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unelected candidates for political office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates — if you cannot show and properly source that he was already notable enough for an article for some other reason before becoming a candidate, then he has to win the election, not just run in it, to get a Wikipedia article for the election itself. But nothing here is enough, and the referencing is nowhere near good enough to claim a WP:GNG pass (it's based entirely on primary sources and user-generated "complete and total coverage of every election" directories.) Bearcat (talk) 15:27, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 12 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.