Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Nash (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Music West Records. Randykitty (talk) 17:35, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Kenneth Nash
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage from reliable secondary sources and WP:MUSIC (nothing on charting, tours, albums, awards). The sources in the article are AllMusic listing and a passing one sentence mention. In my WP:BEFORE search I found this, which is not a WP:SIGCOV source. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:59, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 10:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 10:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 10:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep and Merge with Music West Records. -- PATH SLOPU (Talk) 06:51, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Can you clarify what you mean here, ? You cannot keep and merge the article at the same time. Or you mean keep the content but merge? While I always support a good WP:ATD, problem is that Music West Records does not have any detailed info about their artists, and it does not really make sense to integrate just Nash into it. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:08, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep with merge I mean that keep the content by merging the article with Music West Records. Because Kenneth Nash worked for it. -- PATH SLOPU (Talk) 01:48, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 13:18, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge per Path slopu's sensible suggestion. -The Gnome (talk) 11:54, 20 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.