Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Uwadi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:12, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Kenneth Uwadi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD removed without explanation by creator, but the problems which led me to PROD it and another user to endorse the PROD have not been solved. Unfortunately, this fellow simply has not received coverage in reliable sources. Like, at all. The stories cited are by him, not about him. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 18:36, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. A PROD would probably be the best way to go, however. BurtAlert (talk) 19:53, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I know, that's why I PRODed it - but once someone has removed a PROD tag it has to go to AfD, which is what happened here! Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 01:39, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, fair enough. Well I definitely agree with the deletion of this article. BurtAlert (talk) 01:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep.I dont agree with the proposed deletion of this article.I created this article.It is not a copy write.The article is by me Chioma Amadi and not by any one else and has verifiable sources.The article can be improved through regular editing, rather than deletion.Also there are relevant Google search results for Kenneth Uwadichiomaamadi (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:57, 28 March 2011 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete I looked for sources before endorsing Roscelese's prod. We can verify nothing other than this guy is a journalist.--Banana (talk) 23:55, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes,the article is about a Nigerian journalist.At least,you have been able to varify something.There are relevant Google search results.The article can be improved through regular editing, rather than deletion.--chiomaamadi (talk) 06:36, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:36, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete The search I pulled up and the references listed in the article appear to be written by the subject. The references must be about the subject and substantiate notability.  I do not see where this person meets WP:GNG as these articles are by the subject, or even if any of these articles would qualify under WP:AUTHOR to attempt to qualify.  Enfcer (talk) 02:59, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.