Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent Norman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete, without prejudice against recreation, as long as the editor is neither the subject nor a sockpuppet. Deathphoenix ʕ 04:50, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Kent Norman
Originally prodded for deletion, but the subject himself, User:Klnorman took it off. I suppose the question is whether he meets the professor test or not. I don't typically like to delete things, but because Kent took it off the delete list himself, I'd really like the community to look at this one. The reasons Ifnord added the proposed deletion tag were as follows:

"Non-notable. ~800 Google hits (First two entries are here and mirror site) and fails professor test. Also vanity... Ifnord 03:29, 12 June 2006 (UTC)"

Sparsefarce 23:20, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. I don't see how this guy meets any of the criteria under the professor test, and he fails WP:BIO. This is a vanity page. Aplomado  talk 23:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * weak delete He seems notable enough if you look at his real publication list. However, he's not soo notable as to grant a pass on Jimbo's "Don't create your own articles folks."  Worse yet, he has continued to edit his own article.  Deletion should not prejudice aginst recreation by another author. JeffBurdges 11:33, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.