Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent Shaw


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Kent Shaw

 * – ( View AfD View log )

BLP based on a personal interview with the subject. Does not pass WP:NPROF or WP:AUTHOR. Mccapra (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Waddles 🗩 🖉 17:32, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks WP:TOOSOON for WP:NAUTHOR or WP:CREATIVE, especially in a field that is not reviewed so frequently as with prose books.  WP:NPROF is unlikely for an assistant professor.  No other signs of notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 07:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This does not meet WP:NAUTHOR or WP:BASIC and fails WP:PROF because the subject appears to have been an assistant lecturer, not an adjunct professor, nearly two decades ago. While the subject has had some luck in publishing poetry in small presses, notability has not been shown. Clearly fails WP:GNG. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 21:45, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to pass WP:NPROF, WP:AUTHOR, or WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:38, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete the only claim to notability seems to be the  Tampa Review Prize but that by itself is not substantial enough. --hroest 21:27, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NPROF, WP:AUTHOR, and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:51, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NAUTHOR, WP:NACADEMIC, and WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 23:16, 25 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.